Archive | For Writers

Tags: ,

Screenwriter On Why He Won’t Read New Writer’s Scripts

Posted on 21 September 2009 by TRLocke

The article is important because it was written by an Oscar-nominated screenwriter, Josh Olson, and has a lot to say about different people’s  attitudes towards novices trying to break into screenwriting.

The point the author makes that sticks most with me is simply that if you’re going to ask for feedback, be ready to receive it. He argues that the careful feedback he gave wasn’t appreciated by the new writer. The writer seemed to be looking for a pat on the back or some other form of affirmation more so than true honest feedback. My first entry in this blog was called “Develop a Thick Skin.” That is true of all aspects of life in Hollywood. Hollywood judges artistic creativity on a daily basis. Whether someone is shooting holes in your perfect story, or yelling “Next” as soon as you flash your brilliant smile, rejection and criticism is part of the game.

But there’s another point the comments make that’s worth remembering as well. Josh spoke authoritatively on his own convictions about  reading screenplays. Those are his opinions. If you read the comments, you’ll notice a lot of people agree–they hate reading scripts too.  But hundreds of other writers disagree, including a number who’ve written their own blogs in response such as Franzine Kafka, and the screenwriter over at Hollywood Roaster. Once again the law of averages is in play. The simple truth is if you keep knocking on enough doors eventually one will open.  Josh may not read your script, but there are tons of producers, writers, directors and agents who will.

Comments (11)

Tags: , , ,

Sequels, Prequels and Now in 3D!

Posted on 01 September 2009 by TRLocke

poster-jaws-3d1 “Does that say Toy Story 2?” my daughter asked me as we passed a bus stop sign here in Burbank today.

“Yeah.”

“Oh, it’s in 3D… They already did Toy Story 2, but they’re just putting it back in theaters in 3D?”

“Yeah, that’s how they do it here.” I responded. “They resell the same movie over and over to new audiences as soon as they figure there’s a new market.”

I can’t say that I blame studios. If we’re stupid enough to go to theaters to re-view the same movie we could view at home, then they should keep releasing the same movies. Milk us for all they can get from us. Why not?

As I mention in my book, a few years ago I was in negotiations with Fox to write the sequel to the Omen. Fox wanted my take on how to keep the franchise moving along. They suggested that they wanted to begin to remarket movies they already had in their vault along the lines of what Universal had been doing with the Beethoven series. “You don’t have to buy ads for those movies. You just put it out on the shelf and it rents because everyone already knows the series. The series is the star.”

That is the highest goal of any studio—to own a series that never fails to draw an audience. Fox wanted to do that with The Omen. At the time, I hadn’t realized they’d already done four Omen movies. I was only familiar with three. At the end of the third, Damien, the Antichrist, was killed.

Apparently, Fox tried to resurrect this franchise once before. They decided a little girl would be born this time and would have the same evil in her. You didn’t see The Omen 4 because it sucked. It took me more than a week to find a video store that even carried it. By the rules in play at the time, I told the executives at Fox that the franchise was dead. That, even though Omen 4 left a definite opening for a sequel, no one would ever want to see it because the series now officially sucked. It had “jumped the Shark” as they say. The original Omen had birthed the soundtrack of operatic Latin that would go on to haunt nearly every film concerned with the devil or demons since. Omen 4 turned the greatest evil on earth into a hop-scotching joke.

So how did Fox solve this dilemma? The same way so many other studios have been quietly resolving it. They simply released the same movie they released in the seventies. Really? Yeah. Why not? The 18-34 demographic Hollywood aims at never saw the original, so all it takes is a little updating and a small budget and voila! What used to be reserved for Miracle on 34th Street every 30 years or so gets applied to everything. But now it’s no longer called “an updated classic,” it’s simply released as if it’s never been released before.

Halloween gets redone and re-released, then Halloween 2. I believe they took that franchise to seven films—ending with “Halloween H20—Twenty Years Later.” Next? Halloween 3D. It’s in the works—just like The Final Destination—the latest incarnation of that series that sits atop the weekend box-office. Toy Story 2 comes out in 3D too. I’m waiting on Jaws 3D… Oh, wait… they did that one. I guess we see where this is going. Or maybe we don’t.

How many times will people pay money to see the same film over and over again? That’s the question studios want to answer. So far it seems the answer is endless numbers of times for the right film franchise. What’s great for studios now is that it longer takes the passage of years to re-release films. It seems they can re-release them within a year or two and still draw a crowd. It is, after all, what Hollywood does—sell us what we want—or at least what we’re willing to pay for.

T.R. Locke

Comments (5)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tip #1 For Making it in Hollywood–Thick Skin

Posted on 28 May 2009 by TRLocke

Mmm. The first real tip. Let’s see. How’s this…?

Thick Skin

Develop a very thick skin.

I just happened to see the job listings from UTA (United Talent Agency). The job listings are supposed to be internal openings that agents and their assistants browse to learn what production companies, or their own clients, are looking for in terms of support staff. Most of the listings are for agent assistants, celebrity assistants, interns/trainees and other lower-level studio executives. They are the kind of jobs many people who come to Hollywood hope to land in order to get a foot in the door.

These lists get swiped and passed around through email. Join almost any creative support group and you’re likely to come across one or more from a major agency. They all have them. And some of the jobs pay decent wages, too. You can be a celebrity assistant for instance and earn “$48K/year–no benefits.” However the reply link was via a country music company, so it might not be enough money.

What traits do many of the jobs look for? Well, along with, “must be willing to work flexible hours and be utterly committed to the job,” one very telling request was as follows: “Must have thick skin.”

What makes someone put that in a job posting? Not sure, but I would guess they lost their prior assistant because they cussed them out one too many times.

Thick skin. It’s not only good for assistants working for agents and celebrities, but it’s a must for any creative person who puts their talent up for judgment.

In fact, thick skin might be too soft a term–try armor plating. “Must have armor plating.” Armor is better than skin for repelling the knives that often fly at you. “Must be bulletproof.”

Whatever dreams you might have in Hollywood, unless you’re extremely lucky, you’ll encounter lots of rejection before you find it.  Not letting that rejection penetrate,  not taking the harsh comments to heart–letting them bounce off your thick skin will definitely help you stay on track and give you a better shot at reaching your goals.

Keep at it,

T. R. Locke

Please share these tips with your friends by clicking the Share This button below to send a link by email or recommend this post on your favorite social site.

Comments (3)

Buy at a Bookstore Near You
Script Coverage
Proctor Review
Craig Review
Trujillo Review
Twitter
YourGhostwriterOnline.com
Buy My Book at Amazon
Herman Review
Buy At Barnes and Nobel
The ABL Buttons
Book Critique 1

Twitter Followers

Twitter Followers

Follow T. R. on Twitter:

  • TRLocke At the West Coast Premier Tourny in Rialto. 64 teams. 4 locations. Aja playing at 11:20 and 7:30. Wish her luck and pray for safety. Time ago 2 Days
  • As a public service, please share. t.co/O1pd68Zs Time ago 3 Days
  • Mmm. Good point. Thoughts? t.co/R7lhmFdJ Time ago 3 Days
  • Interesting argument. I'd love to hear folks thoughts on this--not just the ones I tagged below. Two quotes from... t.co/82HvuM9W Time ago 6 Days
  • Check out my latest articles: t.co/l40Nly7X Time ago 6 Days
  • Happy Mother's Day, Ladies! Hope you all have a great one. Time ago 8 Days
  • Walking a lap at the relay for life in Johnny Carson Park at night. Thousands of lit bags, each signifying a person who suffered with cancer Time ago 8 Days
  • Happy Mother's Day to all the wonderful, longsuffering, beautiful, strong, faithful, self-sacrificing, loving and... t.co/PSKtMqJP Time ago 9 Days

Follow @TRLocke on twitter.